JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 22, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Luis Orlando Bernal Barbosa

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Veinte Penal Municipal De Bogota Y La Subseccion "a" De La Seccion Cuarta Del Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca. Ordena Al Juzgado Veinte Penal Municipal De Bogota Inicie El Tramite De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Secretaria De Transito Y Transporte
  • Orden para iniciar de forma inmediata su trámite
  • Suspensión de la decisión afecta derechos fundamentales
  • Inobservancia del Decreto 2591 de 1991
  • Rechazo de plano cuando no se corrige dentro del término de tres días
Acción De Tutela
  • Trámite sin dilaciones injustificadas
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Función residual de la Corte Constitucional
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Dejar sin efecto el auto del cinco (5) de enero de 2005, proferido por el Juzgado 20 Penal Municipal de Bogota D.C., dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Luis Orlando Bernal Barbosa.
  2. Segundo. Ordenar al Juzgado 20 Penal Municipal de Bogota D.C., que inicie, de forma inmediata, el tramite de la accion de tutela de la referencia conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.